|
Cropwatch |
No: 3 | |
|
Blue Cypress oil [Callitris intratropica Benth. et Hook f.]
© Tony Burfield May 2004 |
|
|
|
In keeping with our
follow up investigations on failed get-rich-quick plantation schemes in
Australia, I am thankful to Jim Gobert for alerting me to another story,
which has, allegedly, lost investors millions. Blue cypress essential oil is
produced by a special process from the heartwood, wood, and bark of the
North Cypress Pine -
a member of the Southern Conifer group of the Cupressaceae family, which
grows to 45m. and has fragrant wood. It is one of a number of native cypress
trees which grow in the aboriginal lands of Australia (e.g. the northerly
Bathurst and Melville Islands), but its geographic isolation has prevented
its commercial exploitation for a considerable time. Aboriginal uses of the
resin from Callitris intratropica include employment as glue and for
contraceptive uses (Bowman & Harris 1995). It was widely promoted in the
essential oils and aromatherapy professions a decade past. It can be steam
distilled from the heartwood/wood/bark, but a solvent extracted “oil” is
also available, appearing as a deep blue-black, highly coloured mobile
liquid, where much was previously made of its azulene-like properties. Properties
However Cropwatch’s opinion is
that it is hard to see why the oil should be particularly attractive to
perfumers. Burfield (2000) describes the oil as follows: “In colder weather
the oil may become semi-, or almost completely, solid (presumably due to the
guaiol content). The odour is overwhelmingly woody, and slightly
earthy, the top-note being multi-faceted, with the following aspects being
discernable: there is a medicinal almost ylang-like note, a minor pine-like
quality, a touch of spiciness and a pineapple-like fruitiness. After a few
minutes the odour profile becomes piney-resinous, loosing some dryness and
becoming sweeter. The dry-out is woody-earthy and celery-like.” It
isn’t regarded by the author as particularly interesting perfumery material,
but it may have a certain novelty ingredient status.
The composition of the oil is summarized
again by Burfield (2000): “The oil contains sesquiterpenes such as b-elemene
and d-selinene and sesquiterpene alcohols such as guaiol (26%) and b-eudesmol
(6.3%). The blue colouring may be ascribed, at least in part, to the
presence of guaiazulene (1.6%) although other complex structures with a
resemblance to the azulene moiety are present.
In a (somewhat strange) attempt to
compare the oil with other commercial oils, some attention has been drawn to
an alleged similarity with another guaiol containing oil: guaiacwood oil,
although the sweetness of guaiacwood oil is not particularly mirrored in
this oil. However the oil has been ‘image marketed’ in the cosmetics trade
on the fact that it is the only wood oil containing guaiazulene which has
alleged anti-bacterial properties (although a more cost-effective and more
ecologically sound plant source of guaiazulene might be German chamomile
oil). Bowles (2000) previously set out the oil’s history & chemistry, as
well as outlining the uses of the oil, and its anti-inflammatory,
anti-irritant and anti-viral effects. The author’s experience of the oil has
been less upbeat, centering around poor keeping quality and unacceptable
batch to batch variability.
Legal wrangles
The Age, an Australian
newspaper, carried a story (“Bitter Blue”) on April 21, 2004, described a
legal wrangle over patents and allegations of deception. The battle is
described as being between Mike Collins who claims to have discovered the
oil first, and Bill McGilvray, well known essential oil producer, and former
president of the Australian Tea-Tree Industry
Association. The article describes a decision
taken by the Delegate of the Commissioner of Patents
in June 2002, ruling that
McGilvray should loose the rights to log the trees on
Aboriginal and on Crown land for allegedly breaching contracts and failing
to pay royalties according to the Government and spokesmen of the Tiwi
aboriginal people.
It is further reported in the article that seven South African investors
lost $100,000 in the wrangle. You can read the full story at
http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2004/04/20/1082395850945.html
References:
Bowles J. (2000) Simply Essential. Aug 2000.
Bowman D.M.J.S. & Harris S. “Conifers of
Australia’s dry forests and open woodlands. In: Ecology of the Southern
Conifers pp252-270 eds. Enright NJ & Hill RS. Smithsonian Institution
Press, Washington DC.
Burfield T (2000) Natural Aromatic
Materials – Odours & Orgins pub AIA Tampa.
Sandalwood Update.
It has been puzzling many of us exactly
what is going on with Sandalwood oil EI – suspicious as ever, some of us old
hands suspect that some batches of oil are being adulterated in new ways
which we haven’t yet fathomed!
Sandalwood Oil East African
Osyris lanceolata
Hochst. & Steud.
No – not the Sandalwood East African material deriving
from Tanzanian Osyris tenuifolia Engl. (“bastard sandalwood”) which
has lanceol as its principle component! It was somewhat surprising for us to
learn at this point that there is a new kid on the block in the form of
Sandalwood oil East African from Osyris lanceolata. The
scented wood from this 8-10m. tree native to S. Africa, makes an interesting
oil, having an initial strong sickly sweet note which rapidly gives way to a
metallic-rubbery-woody note slightly reminding of Cedarwood. The profile
lacks the sensuality of E.I. Sandalwood oil. The dry-own is a smooth
somewhat sweet creamy woody note, much less crude and more pleasant than the
top note and more similar to E.I. Sandalwood, but as noted for the top note,
still lacking the sensual quality of E.I. Sandalwood oil. Its highish
concentration of sanatols (probably 32% max) and high santalyl acetate
content (approx 35% typical) may make it seem an
attractive proposition to some.
Apparently 150 tons of logs of Osyris lanceolata
per month are being imported into India by a company in Mumbai (which claims
to be the largest importer) – and who’s literature states sales of oils,
chips, powder etc. are made into chewing tobaccos, attars, perfumery and the
agarbatti/joss-stick industries. The company admits also to producing
between 750-800 Kg of East African sandalwood oil per month (Banker 2004).
However the sustainability of this practice is far from clear - reports of
the threatened status of Osyris lanceolata in the Eastern Arc
mountains of Tanzania can be viewed at
http://global.finland.fi/julkaisut/group_3.htm.
Further, a report on oil on the resource status of Osyris lanceolata
in Tanzania and oil quality variation amongst endemic trees populations by
Mwang'ingo, P.L. et al.can be viewed at
http://www.inasp.info/ajol/journals/safj/vol199abs.html.
From these reports the situation would seem to show cause for concern.
Ref: Banker R (2004) Personal communication to author.
Sandalwood oil New Caledonian Santalum austrocaledonicum
Viell. var. austrocaledonicum.
Now being promoted and sold by several
essential oil companies, it remains to be seen how long this source,
previously reported to be threatened, will last. So what do we know?
We know that sandalwood trees (Santalum
austrocaledonicum) which grow from 5-12m. and may reach 30-45 cm. in
girth, are widespread on the Isle of Pines and in the Loyalty islands around
Noumea and to the north of the main island. On Grande Tierre it only occurs
in a few restricted areas (SPRIG 2000). We also know from the same source
that three varieties are distinguished S. austrocaledonicum var.
austrocaledonicum, S. austrocaledonicum var. pilosulum, S.
austrocaledonicum var. minutum, and that morphological and oil
content differences occur between S. austrocaledonicum var.
austrocaledonicum trees on Loyalty Island and “the Ile des Pines”
provenance. We also know that subspecies of Santalum species might
show some variations sesquiterpenoid composition, however S.
austrocaledonicum oils from several geographic locations are known to be
able to pass the ISO 3518 criteria for Sandalwood oils, although the optical
rotation criteria may be a stumbling block.
New Caledonia was reported as having 360,000 hectares of
forest land but only 10,000 under cultivation ref:
www.fao.org/DOCREP/004/Y1997E/y1997e19.htm
As the European Forestry Institute points out at http://www.efi.fi/cis/english/creports/vanuatu.php
“In general, current timber export markets in Asia and New Caledonia do not
require information on the environmental standards and impacts of logging
operations”. This is important because energy intensive steam distillation
of small charges (250-300Kg) of sandalwood chippings or shavings to produce
the sandalwood crude oil (this crude grade is being sold into aromatherapy),
take up to 2 days to complete and thereby generate relatively large amounts
of carbon emissions per kilo of oil, contributing to the overall negative
ecological impact of the operation. As several minor Pacific Islands are
currently being submerged through the effects global warming, this is a
sensitive issue. Cropwatch has been making representation to
Australian entrepreneurs in the Pacific connected with Sandalwood
exploitation suggesting that the implementation of solar distillation rather
than importing diesel to generate steam would perhaps help reduce this
negative impact, however it is to be remembered that Australia is not a
signatory to the Kyoto protocol and has little internal pressure to act in a
deep green ecological manner. It is also to be remembered that Oceana itself
causes a huge carbon emission loading to the world atmosphere which can only
be added to by diesel or wood-fired distillation processes.
Cherrier (1993) reported on the
difficulties of sandalwood cultivation in New Caledonia noting heartwood
development was proportional to proper development (fast growing trees
producing less heartwood). On the narrower subject of sustainability,
Ehrhart (1997) presented a fairly optimistic report on the status of known
consistent sandalwood stocks in New Caledonia (in contrast to the depleted
situation in many/most other South Pacific locations), and makes the point
that surveyed sustainable logging management should be possible in these
circumstances (yearly quotas have been set at 55 to 60 tons of wood).
However, apart from illegal cropping & fire damage, the danger is that of
over-exploitation – the bio-resources of New Caledonia to supply Sandalwood
oil are unlikely to be able to supply more than a few percent (i.e. probably
no more than 2 tons max.) of the total Sandalwood oil demand – which will be
severely tested now that leading French aroma houses are currently offering
oil from this origin. Further, as indicated above, whilst the emphasis in
the sales propaganda by Sandalwood oil salesmen has largely centered on
examining tree sustainability, the negative aspects concerning the total
environmental impact of the operation can easily be overlooked.
Santalum album
plantations Australia At the
time of going to press, a report about the lack of any impact assessment
study ever being carried out, and a statement concerning economic failure of
investment schemes for S. album plantations have had to be held over
for a future issue. Meanwhile mailed comments on the status of Santalum
spp. in Australia covered in Cropwatch 2 have been received by the
author from two senior Australian Forestry officials, who have unfortunately
declined permission to have their observations reproduced here.
Tasmania:
destruction of the forest eco-system. Its
hard to miss the press coverage on this lately, with The Guardian
reporting that concerns about Australian forests are an election issue, and
the singer Chrissie Hynde supporting the boycott of Tasmania as a holiday
destination etc. by People for the Ethnic Treatment of Animals (Peta).
Meanwhile loggers seem to prove once again prove that whatever the country
concerned, they are above the law and cannot be stopped. Richard Flannagan (Guardian
April 21, 2004 p16) wrote an impassioned article about the setting alight of
Tasmanian rainforest which is felled before being napalmed, much of the wood
being sold as unprocessed wood chips. Magnificent Eucalyptus regnans
trees of enormous stature and great age are gone forever, and pictures of
such a cleared area of the Styx Valley in Tasmania have previously featured
in an earlier Guardian feature by David Fickling (Guardian
March 22, 2004). Flannagan also describes the close relationship that
Tasmanian politicians enjoy with Gunns Ltd., the largest logging company in
Australia and how the population is cowed – to question this action is to
risk ostracisation or unemployment. Fickling mentions in more detail that 2
board members of Gunns were criticised in an official bribery inquiry in
1989, and the fact that Tasmania’s acting premier, Paul Lennon visited
Scandinavian pulp mills with Gunns chief executive, John Gray. Perhaps
Cropwatch is starting to understand why we meet a brick wall so many we
try to communicate with in that felled continent. Meanwhile comprehensive
information on the unsustainable activities of Gunns Ltd. can be viewed on
the Wilderness Societies website at
http://www.wilderness.org.au/campaigns/corporate/gunns/ GM non-food
crops.
A
very well researched report by GeneWatch's director Dr. Susan Mayer at
www.genewatch.org/CropsAndFood/Reports/non-food_crops_part2.pdf
identifies some research on GM crops intended for non-food use: grasses,
flowers, trees, and crops such as cotton used for fibre production. Tree
species referred to include Betula pendula, Eucalyptus camuldensis,
Eucalyptus globulus, Liquidamber spp. etc., and details of
trials being carried out in Canada on larches and black spruce figure
amongst much other identified work. Mayer notes that there are no GM trees
available commercially as such, but work has been carried out to transfer
insect resistance, and herbicide tolerance. In the flowers section of the
report you will find reference of "the molecular breeder" Florigene (offices
in Australia & Netherlands) and its’ interests in the cut flower industry –
giving relevant information on patents for roses, carnations,
chrysanthemums. Mayer also disturbingly reports on retailed mauve & violet
GM carnations with extended vase life sold by Florigene & Suntory in
Australia & Japan respectively. In India, Ashok Sharma reported in February this year writing in the Financial Express (http://www.financialexpress.com/fe_full_story.php?content_id=53684) that the Indian Minister for Agriculture Rajnath Singh inaugurated the Centre for Transgenic Plant Development in Jamia Hamdard in Delhi. Sharma reports that the centre has already developed a transgenic herb Chicory (Cichorium intybus L.) which has a 40% higher content of esculin, which has skin protective properties. Other ongoing work at the centre includes studies on ACC oxidase to improve the shelf life of vegetables & fruits and chalcone synthase for flower colour modulation. Since several Indian aromatic raw material producers that the author has spoken to clearly understand that going down the GM route would jeopardise sales of these materials into EU markets, these developments in allied areas seem surprising.
works Photo
|
References:
Cherrier, J-F, 1993. “Sandalwood in New Caledonia”. In F.H. McKinnell (ed) Sandalwood in the Pacific Region. Proceedings of a symposium held on 2 June 1991 at the XVII Pacific Science Congress, Honolulu, Hawaii. Canberra: ACIAR Proceedings No.49. pp19-22.
Ehrhart Y. (1997) “Descriptions of some Sandal
Populations in the South West Pacific: Consequences etc.” ACIR Proc.
84, 105-112.
SPRIG (2000)
The information supplied in this bulletin is believed
to be accurate, but views, comments, criticisms, corrections or additional
material can be forwarded to
info@cropwatch.org for consideration in future communiqués in the
Cropwatch series. |